Subject: Designer Footwear from Gucci Prada Chanel & More, buy direct, forget department store prices I’m reverting back to 2.6.5 to see if the problem persists. This seems to have started when I upgraded to 2.6.6. All changes that were made to the white list of Anti-Spam addresses will be saved. It adapts to the mail that you receive to get even better with time. Powerful Bayesian spam filtering results in high accuracy and almost no false positives. I looked at my whitelist and saw a number of very suspicious addresses on it, which make me think SS has missed more of the false negatives I’ve trained manually. SpamSieve for macOS works with any number of mail accounts, of whatever types are supported by your e-mail software (e.g. But SS has no record of my marking it, so it kept the address in the whitelist and let other spams with that address through. I mark all spam that gets through as false positives, and I specifically remember marking this one, as I thought the subject was particularly weird. The log shows Spam Sieve marking it as good, but there’s no entry that shows where I marked it as a false positive. ![]() Notice the entries for, the subject wonyun. I’ve reproduced an example from my log below. It looks like SpamSieve is sometimes not acknowledging when I train a false positive. I dug through my log and I noticed something strange. Running this script will export certain blocklist rules (from address rules with ends with, starts with, and regex styles) to the clipboard. ![]() Before I might get one a day in my inbox, but now I’m seeing six or seven, sometimes more. You can copy all your blocklist and whitelist rules to another Mac by following the instructions here. Over the past few weeks Spam sieve has been letting more spam through than it has been.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |